100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go

Bradford S. Bell, Scott I. Tannenbaum, J. Kevin Ford, Raymond A. Noe, Kurt Kraiger

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    • 2 Citations

    Abstract

    Training and development research has a long tradition within applied psychology dating back to the early 1900s. Over the years, not only has interest in the topic grown but there have been dramatic changes in both the science and practice of training and development. In the current article, we examine the evolution of training and development research using articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) as a primary lens to analyze what we have learned and to identify where future research is needed. We begin by reviewing the timeline of training and development research in JAP from 1918 to the present in order to elucidate the critical trends and advances that define each decade. These trends include the emergence of more theory-driven training research, greater consideration of the role of the trainee and training context, examination of learning that occurs outside the classroom, and understanding training's impact across different levels of analysis. We then examine in greater detail the evolution of 4 key research themes: training criteria, trainee characteristics, training design and delivery, and the training context. In each area, we describe how the focus of research has shifted over time and highlight important developments. We conclude by offering several ideas for future training and development research.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)305-323
    Number of pages19
    JournalJournal of Applied Psychology
    Volume102
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

    Profile

    Applied Psychology
    Learning

    Keywords

    • Employee development
    • Individual differences
    • Instruction
    • Learning
    • Training

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Applied Psychology

    Cite this

    100 years of training and development research : What we know and where we should go. / Bell, Bradford S.; Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Kevin Ford, J.; Noe, Raymond A.; Kraiger, Kurt.

    In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 305-323.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Bell, Bradford S.; Tannenbaum, Scott I.; Kevin Ford, J.; Noe, Raymond A.; Kraiger, Kurt / 100 years of training and development research : What we know and where we should go.

    In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 102, No. 3, 01.03.2017, p. 305-323.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{ef2fd9d908854302b963688e6072c885,
    title = "100 years of training and development research: What we know and where we should go",
    abstract = "Training and development research has a long tradition within applied psychology dating back to the early 1900s. Over the years, not only has interest in the topic grown but there have been dramatic changes in both the science and practice of training and development. In the current article, we examine the evolution of training and development research using articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) as a primary lens to analyze what we have learned and to identify where future research is needed. We begin by reviewing the timeline of training and development research in JAP from 1918 to the present in order to elucidate the critical trends and advances that define each decade. These trends include the emergence of more theory-driven training research, greater consideration of the role of the trainee and training context, examination of learning that occurs outside the classroom, and understanding training's impact across different levels of analysis. We then examine in greater detail the evolution of 4 key research themes: training criteria, trainee characteristics, training design and delivery, and the training context. In each area, we describe how the focus of research has shifted over time and highlight important developments. We conclude by offering several ideas for future training and development research.",
    keywords = "Employee development, Individual differences, Instruction, Learning, Training",
    author = "Bell, {Bradford S.} and Tannenbaum, {Scott I.} and {Kevin Ford}, J. and Noe, {Raymond A.} and Kurt Kraiger",
    year = "2017",
    month = "3",
    doi = "10.1037/apl0000142",
    volume = "102",
    pages = "305--323",
    journal = "Journal of Applied Psychology",
    issn = "0021-9010",
    publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - 100 years of training and development research

    T2 - Journal of Applied Psychology

    AU - Bell,Bradford S.

    AU - Tannenbaum,Scott I.

    AU - Kevin Ford,J.

    AU - Noe,Raymond A.

    AU - Kraiger,Kurt

    PY - 2017/3/1

    Y1 - 2017/3/1

    N2 - Training and development research has a long tradition within applied psychology dating back to the early 1900s. Over the years, not only has interest in the topic grown but there have been dramatic changes in both the science and practice of training and development. In the current article, we examine the evolution of training and development research using articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) as a primary lens to analyze what we have learned and to identify where future research is needed. We begin by reviewing the timeline of training and development research in JAP from 1918 to the present in order to elucidate the critical trends and advances that define each decade. These trends include the emergence of more theory-driven training research, greater consideration of the role of the trainee and training context, examination of learning that occurs outside the classroom, and understanding training's impact across different levels of analysis. We then examine in greater detail the evolution of 4 key research themes: training criteria, trainee characteristics, training design and delivery, and the training context. In each area, we describe how the focus of research has shifted over time and highlight important developments. We conclude by offering several ideas for future training and development research.

    AB - Training and development research has a long tradition within applied psychology dating back to the early 1900s. Over the years, not only has interest in the topic grown but there have been dramatic changes in both the science and practice of training and development. In the current article, we examine the evolution of training and development research using articles published in the Journal of Applied Psychology (JAP) as a primary lens to analyze what we have learned and to identify where future research is needed. We begin by reviewing the timeline of training and development research in JAP from 1918 to the present in order to elucidate the critical trends and advances that define each decade. These trends include the emergence of more theory-driven training research, greater consideration of the role of the trainee and training context, examination of learning that occurs outside the classroom, and understanding training's impact across different levels of analysis. We then examine in greater detail the evolution of 4 key research themes: training criteria, trainee characteristics, training design and delivery, and the training context. In each area, we describe how the focus of research has shifted over time and highlight important developments. We conclude by offering several ideas for future training and development research.

    KW - Employee development

    KW - Individual differences

    KW - Instruction

    KW - Learning

    KW - Training

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85010378921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85010378921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1037/apl0000142

    DO - 10.1037/apl0000142

    M3 - Article

    VL - 102

    SP - 305

    EP - 323

    JO - Journal of Applied Psychology

    JF - Journal of Applied Psychology

    SN - 0021-9010

    IS - 3

    ER -