Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number

Iffat T. Shaikmohammad, Deep Bandyopadhyay, Karuna S. Koppula, André Bénard, Charles A. Petty

    Research output: ResearchConference contribution

    Abstract

    The objective of this work was to assess the performance of single-phase flow and two-phase turbulent flow models implemented in FLUENT 6.2 using experimental data and the realizability diagram for the Reynolds stress. The Reynolds stress must have positive or zero eigenvalues to be physical and the invariant diagram bounds the region corresponding such eigenvalues. The various turbulence models applied in the single phase flow simulations proved to be realizable except for the Spalart-Allmaras model (Spalart et al., 1992) which showed to be unrealizable at various locations. Moreover, the Realizable k-ε model (Shih et al., 1995), which was realizable for single-phase flows, became unrealizable for the primary phase in the two-phase flow simulations. It is unclear if the inaccuracies arise due the numerical implementation or the coupling of the granular model with the turbulence model. In addition, the gas-solid flow model was not able to predict the right order of pressure drop across the riser. Also, the predicted time averaged profiles of the axial and span wise particle velocities showed poor agreement with the experimental findings (Ibsen et al., 2001) The gas-solid flow numerical model does not appear to be capable of predicting the correct interaction of the turbulent gas phase and particles. It was observed that the dispersion of the secondary phase is under predicted and the numerical results did not predict a dense bottom bed as seen in the experimental set-up.

    LanguageEnglish (US)
    Title of host publicationAIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings
    StatePublished - 2006
    Event2006 AIChE Annual Meeting - San Francisco, CA, United States
    Duration: Nov 12 2006Nov 17 2006

    Other

    Other2006 AIChE Annual Meeting
    CountryUnited States
    CitySan Francisco, CA
    Period11/12/0611/17/06

    Profile

    Computational fluid dynamics
    Reynolds number
    Fluids
    Computer simulation
    Gases
    Flow of solids
    Flow simulation
    Turbulence models
    Two phase flow
    Turbulent flow
    Pressure drop
    Numerical models

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Chemical Engineering(all)
    • Chemistry(all)

    Cite this

    Shaikmohammad, I. T., Bandyopadhyay, D., Koppula, K. S., Bénard, A., & Petty, C. A. (2006). Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number. In AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings

    Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number. / Shaikmohammad, Iffat T.; Bandyopadhyay, Deep; Koppula, Karuna S.; Bénard, André; Petty, Charles A.

    AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings. 2006.

    Research output: ResearchConference contribution

    Shaikmohammad, IT, Bandyopadhyay, D, Koppula, KS, Bénard, A & Petty, CA 2006, Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number. in AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings. 2006 AIChE Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, United States, 11/12/06.
    Shaikmohammad IT, Bandyopadhyay D, Koppula KS, Bénard A, Petty CA. Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number. In AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings. 2006.
    Shaikmohammad, Iffat T. ; Bandyopadhyay, Deep ; Koppula, Karuna S. ; Bénard, André ; Petty, Charles A./ Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number. AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings. 2006.
    @inbook{372263973da04353a6c32b3f713ed3a8,
    title = "Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number",
    abstract = "The objective of this work was to assess the performance of single-phase flow and two-phase turbulent flow models implemented in FLUENT 6.2 using experimental data and the realizability diagram for the Reynolds stress. The Reynolds stress must have positive or zero eigenvalues to be physical and the invariant diagram bounds the region corresponding such eigenvalues. The various turbulence models applied in the single phase flow simulations proved to be realizable except for the Spalart-Allmaras model (Spalart et al., 1992) which showed to be unrealizable at various locations. Moreover, the Realizable k-ε model (Shih et al., 1995), which was realizable for single-phase flows, became unrealizable for the primary phase in the two-phase flow simulations. It is unclear if the inaccuracies arise due the numerical implementation or the coupling of the granular model with the turbulence model. In addition, the gas-solid flow model was not able to predict the right order of pressure drop across the riser. Also, the predicted time averaged profiles of the axial and span wise particle velocities showed poor agreement with the experimental findings (Ibsen et al., 2001) The gas-solid flow numerical model does not appear to be capable of predicting the correct interaction of the turbulent gas phase and particles. It was observed that the dispersion of the secondary phase is under predicted and the numerical results did not predict a dense bottom bed as seen in the experimental set-up.",
    author = "Shaikmohammad, {Iffat T.} and Deep Bandyopadhyay and Koppula, {Karuna S.} and André Bénard and Petty, {Charles A.}",
    year = "2006",
    isbn = "081691012X",
    booktitle = "AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings",

    }

    TY - CHAP

    T1 - Computational fluid dynamic simulation of a multiphase fluid in vertical flow at high reynolds number

    AU - Shaikmohammad,Iffat T.

    AU - Bandyopadhyay,Deep

    AU - Koppula,Karuna S.

    AU - Bénard,André

    AU - Petty,Charles A.

    PY - 2006

    Y1 - 2006

    N2 - The objective of this work was to assess the performance of single-phase flow and two-phase turbulent flow models implemented in FLUENT 6.2 using experimental data and the realizability diagram for the Reynolds stress. The Reynolds stress must have positive or zero eigenvalues to be physical and the invariant diagram bounds the region corresponding such eigenvalues. The various turbulence models applied in the single phase flow simulations proved to be realizable except for the Spalart-Allmaras model (Spalart et al., 1992) which showed to be unrealizable at various locations. Moreover, the Realizable k-ε model (Shih et al., 1995), which was realizable for single-phase flows, became unrealizable for the primary phase in the two-phase flow simulations. It is unclear if the inaccuracies arise due the numerical implementation or the coupling of the granular model with the turbulence model. In addition, the gas-solid flow model was not able to predict the right order of pressure drop across the riser. Also, the predicted time averaged profiles of the axial and span wise particle velocities showed poor agreement with the experimental findings (Ibsen et al., 2001) The gas-solid flow numerical model does not appear to be capable of predicting the correct interaction of the turbulent gas phase and particles. It was observed that the dispersion of the secondary phase is under predicted and the numerical results did not predict a dense bottom bed as seen in the experimental set-up.

    AB - The objective of this work was to assess the performance of single-phase flow and two-phase turbulent flow models implemented in FLUENT 6.2 using experimental data and the realizability diagram for the Reynolds stress. The Reynolds stress must have positive or zero eigenvalues to be physical and the invariant diagram bounds the region corresponding such eigenvalues. The various turbulence models applied in the single phase flow simulations proved to be realizable except for the Spalart-Allmaras model (Spalart et al., 1992) which showed to be unrealizable at various locations. Moreover, the Realizable k-ε model (Shih et al., 1995), which was realizable for single-phase flows, became unrealizable for the primary phase in the two-phase flow simulations. It is unclear if the inaccuracies arise due the numerical implementation or the coupling of the granular model with the turbulence model. In addition, the gas-solid flow model was not able to predict the right order of pressure drop across the riser. Also, the predicted time averaged profiles of the axial and span wise particle velocities showed poor agreement with the experimental findings (Ibsen et al., 2001) The gas-solid flow numerical model does not appear to be capable of predicting the correct interaction of the turbulent gas phase and particles. It was observed that the dispersion of the secondary phase is under predicted and the numerical results did not predict a dense bottom bed as seen in the experimental set-up.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053791173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053791173&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference contribution

    SN - 081691012X

    SN - 9780816910120

    BT - AIChE Annual Meeting, Conference Proceedings

    ER -