Knowledge management systems usage: Rating scheme validity and the effort-accuracy trade-off

Robin Poston, Cheri Speier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 2 Citations

Abstract

Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.

LanguageEnglish (US)
Pages1-16
Number of pages16
JournalJournal of Organizational and End User Computing
Volume20
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2008

Profile

Knowledge management
User interfaces
Personnel rating
Knowledge management systems
Trade-offs
Rating
Decision making

Keywords

  • Content ratings
  • Empirical study of user behavior
  • KMSs and decision-making
  • KMSs user interfaces
  • Knowledge management systems (KMSs)
  • Usage of knowledge in KMSs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Strategy and Management
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Cite this

Knowledge management systems usage : Rating scheme validity and the effort-accuracy trade-off. / Poston, Robin; Speier, Cheri.

In: Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 1-16.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{560fae5dfac846479fac177c9c0a8ec4,
title = "Knowledge management systems usage: Rating scheme validity and the effort-accuracy trade-off",
abstract = "Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.",
keywords = "Content ratings, Empirical study of user behavior, KMSs and decision-making, KMSs user interfaces, Knowledge management systems (KMSs), Usage of knowledge in KMSs",
author = "Robin Poston and Cheri Speier",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "1--16",
journal = "Journal of Organizational and End User Computing",
issn = "1546-2234",
publisher = "IGI Publishing",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge management systems usage

T2 - Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

AU - Poston,Robin

AU - Speier,Cheri

PY - 2008/1

Y1 - 2008/1

N2 - Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.

AB - Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.

KW - Content ratings

KW - Empirical study of user behavior

KW - KMSs and decision-making

KW - KMSs user interfaces

KW - Knowledge management systems (KMSs)

KW - Usage of knowledge in KMSs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71949123554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71949123554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 1

EP - 16

JO - Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

JF - Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

SN - 1546-2234

IS - 1

ER -