Knowledge management systems usage: Rating scheme validity and the effort-accuracy trade-off

Robin Poston, Cheri Speier

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

    • 2 Citations

    Abstract

    Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.

    LanguageEnglish (US)
    Pages1-16
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Organizational and End User Computing
    Volume20
    Issue number1
    StatePublished - Jan 2008

    Profile

    Knowledge management systems
    Trade-offs
    Rating
    Knowledge management
    End users
    Evaluation
    User interface
    User interfaces
    Decision making
    Information sharing
    Interface design
    Personnel rating

    Keywords

    • Content ratings
    • Empirical study of user behavior
    • KMSs and decision-making
    • KMSs user interfaces
    • Knowledge management systems (KMSs)
    • Usage of knowledge in KMSs

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Computer Science Applications
    • Strategy and Management
    • Human-Computer Interaction

    Cite this

    Knowledge management systems usage : Rating scheme validity and the effort-accuracy trade-off. / Poston, Robin; Speier, Cheri.

    In: Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 20, No. 1, 01.2008, p. 1-16.

    Research output: Research - peer-reviewArticle

    @article{560fae5dfac846479fac177c9c0a8ec4,
    title = "Knowledge management systems usage: Rating scheme validity and the effort-accuracy trade-off",
    abstract = "Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.",
    keywords = "Content ratings, Empirical study of user behavior, KMSs and decision-making, KMSs user interfaces, Knowledge management systems (KMSs), Usage of knowledge in KMSs",
    author = "Robin Poston and Cheri Speier",
    year = "2008",
    month = "1",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "1--16",
    journal = "Journal of Organizational and End User Computing",
    issn = "1546-2234",
    publisher = "IGI Publishing",
    number = "1",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Knowledge management systems usage

    T2 - Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

    AU - Poston,Robin

    AU - Speier,Cheri

    PY - 2008/1

    Y1 - 2008/1

    N2 - Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.

    AB - Humans often seek input from others when solving complex problems and knowledge management systems (KMSs) support, this activity by providing a computer-mediated approach to information sharing. However, if the content provided by the KMS is obsolete or incomplete, end-users may need to exert greater effort to detect these problems or they risk relying on poor inputs leading to less accurate decisions. As a result, most KMSs include rating schemes as part of the user interface designed to help users identify high-quality content. Rating schemes depend on current users rating the quality of the existing content, guiding subsequent users in their future content searches. However, specific ratings may be low in validity and not reflect the true content quality (unintentionally or intentionally). This study examines how rating scheme validity influences how users trade-off search and evaluation effort for decision-making accuracy. Results demonstrate that rating validity differentially influences how KMS search and evaluation effort, relates to decision accuracy. The research findings provide insight into KMS user interface design and how end-users efficiently and effectively use the knowledge in KMSs to make decisions.

    KW - Content ratings

    KW - Empirical study of user behavior

    KW - KMSs and decision-making

    KW - KMSs user interfaces

    KW - Knowledge management systems (KMSs)

    KW - Usage of knowledge in KMSs

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71949123554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71949123554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 1

    EP - 16

    JO - Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

    JF - Journal of Organizational and End User Computing

    SN - 1546-2234

    IS - 1

    ER -