Use of the Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model to describe the performance of nano-composite solid oxide fuel cell cathodes

Jason D. Nicholas, Lin Wang, Ann V. Call, Scott A. Barnett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    • 25 Citations

    Abstract

    Nano-composite Sm 0.5Sr 0.5CoO 3-δ (SSC)-Ce 0.9Gd 0.1O 1.95 (GDC) and La 0.6Sr 0.4Co 0.8Fe 0.2O 3-δ (LSCF)-GDC Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) cathodes with various infiltrate loading levels were prepared through multiple nitrate solution infiltrations into porous GDC ionic conducting (IC) scaffolds. Microstructural analyses indicated that the average SSC and average LSCF hemispherical particle radii remained roughly constant, at 25 nm, across multiple infiltration-gelation-firing sequences. Comparisons between symmetric cell polarization resistance measurements and Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model predictions showed that the SIMPLE model was able to predict the performance of heavily infiltrated SSC-GDC and LSCF-GDC cathodes with accuracies better than 55% and 70%, respectively (without the use of fitting parameters). Poor electronic conduction between mixed ionic electronic conducting (MIEC) infiltrate particles was found in lightly infiltrated cathodes. Since these electronic conduction losses were not accounted for by the SIMPLE model, larger discrepancies between the SIMPLE-model-predicted and measured polarization resistances were observed for lightly infiltrated cathodes. This work demonstrates that the SIMPLE model can be used to quickly determine the lowest possible polarization resistance of a variety of infiltrated MIEC on IC nano-composite cathodes (NCC's) when the NCC microstructure and an experimentally-applicable set of intrinsic MIEC oxygen surface resistances and IC bulk oxygen conductivities are known. Currently, this model is the only one capable of predicting the polarization resistance of heavily infiltrated MIEC on IC NCC's as a function of temperature, cathode thickness, nano-particle size, porosity, and composition.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)15379-15392
    Number of pages14
    JournalPhysical Chemistry Chemical Physics
    Volume14
    Issue number44
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 28 2012

    Profile

    conduction
    Coumestrol
    Anthralin
    cathodes
    Polarization
    polarization
    electronics
    Composite materials
    composite materials
    Methacholine Compounds
    Microstructure
    microstructure
    Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC)
    Infiltration
    cell cathodes
    infiltration
    solid oxide fuel cells
    oxygen
    Dibenzothiepins
    Acetanilides

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
    • Physics and Astronomy(all)

    Cite this

    Use of the Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model to describe the performance of nano-composite solid oxide fuel cell cathodes. / Nicholas, Jason D.; Wang, Lin; Call, Ann V.; Barnett, Scott A.

    In: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 14, No. 44, 28.11.2012, p. 15379-15392.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Nicholas, Jason D.; Wang, Lin; Call, Ann V.; Barnett, Scott A. / Use of the Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model to describe the performance of nano-composite solid oxide fuel cell cathodes.

    In: Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, Vol. 14, No. 44, 28.11.2012, p. 15379-15392.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{79f3365afd804760b07caff83e8682e0,
    title = "Use of the Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model to describe the performance of nano-composite solid oxide fuel cell cathodes",
    abstract = "Nano-composite Sm 0.5Sr 0.5CoO 3-δ (SSC)-Ce 0.9Gd 0.1O 1.95 (GDC) and La 0.6Sr 0.4Co 0.8Fe 0.2O 3-δ (LSCF)-GDC Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) cathodes with various infiltrate loading levels were prepared through multiple nitrate solution infiltrations into porous GDC ionic conducting (IC) scaffolds. Microstructural analyses indicated that the average SSC and average LSCF hemispherical particle radii remained roughly constant, at 25 nm, across multiple infiltration-gelation-firing sequences. Comparisons between symmetric cell polarization resistance measurements and Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model predictions showed that the SIMPLE model was able to predict the performance of heavily infiltrated SSC-GDC and LSCF-GDC cathodes with accuracies better than 55% and 70%, respectively (without the use of fitting parameters). Poor electronic conduction between mixed ionic electronic conducting (MIEC) infiltrate particles was found in lightly infiltrated cathodes. Since these electronic conduction losses were not accounted for by the SIMPLE model, larger discrepancies between the SIMPLE-model-predicted and measured polarization resistances were observed for lightly infiltrated cathodes. This work demonstrates that the SIMPLE model can be used to quickly determine the lowest possible polarization resistance of a variety of infiltrated MIEC on IC nano-composite cathodes (NCC's) when the NCC microstructure and an experimentally-applicable set of intrinsic MIEC oxygen surface resistances and IC bulk oxygen conductivities are known. Currently, this model is the only one capable of predicting the polarization resistance of heavily infiltrated MIEC on IC NCC's as a function of temperature, cathode thickness, nano-particle size, porosity, and composition.",
    author = "Nicholas, {Jason D.} and Lin Wang and Call, {Ann V.} and Barnett, {Scott A.}",
    year = "2012",
    month = "11",
    doi = "10.1039/c2cp43370b",
    volume = "14",
    pages = "15379--15392",
    journal = "Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics",
    issn = "1463-9076",
    publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
    number = "44",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Use of the Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model to describe the performance of nano-composite solid oxide fuel cell cathodes

    AU - Nicholas,Jason D.

    AU - Wang,Lin

    AU - Call,Ann V.

    AU - Barnett,Scott A.

    PY - 2012/11/28

    Y1 - 2012/11/28

    N2 - Nano-composite Sm 0.5Sr 0.5CoO 3-δ (SSC)-Ce 0.9Gd 0.1O 1.95 (GDC) and La 0.6Sr 0.4Co 0.8Fe 0.2O 3-δ (LSCF)-GDC Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) cathodes with various infiltrate loading levels were prepared through multiple nitrate solution infiltrations into porous GDC ionic conducting (IC) scaffolds. Microstructural analyses indicated that the average SSC and average LSCF hemispherical particle radii remained roughly constant, at 25 nm, across multiple infiltration-gelation-firing sequences. Comparisons between symmetric cell polarization resistance measurements and Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model predictions showed that the SIMPLE model was able to predict the performance of heavily infiltrated SSC-GDC and LSCF-GDC cathodes with accuracies better than 55% and 70%, respectively (without the use of fitting parameters). Poor electronic conduction between mixed ionic electronic conducting (MIEC) infiltrate particles was found in lightly infiltrated cathodes. Since these electronic conduction losses were not accounted for by the SIMPLE model, larger discrepancies between the SIMPLE-model-predicted and measured polarization resistances were observed for lightly infiltrated cathodes. This work demonstrates that the SIMPLE model can be used to quickly determine the lowest possible polarization resistance of a variety of infiltrated MIEC on IC nano-composite cathodes (NCC's) when the NCC microstructure and an experimentally-applicable set of intrinsic MIEC oxygen surface resistances and IC bulk oxygen conductivities are known. Currently, this model is the only one capable of predicting the polarization resistance of heavily infiltrated MIEC on IC NCC's as a function of temperature, cathode thickness, nano-particle size, porosity, and composition.

    AB - Nano-composite Sm 0.5Sr 0.5CoO 3-δ (SSC)-Ce 0.9Gd 0.1O 1.95 (GDC) and La 0.6Sr 0.4Co 0.8Fe 0.2O 3-δ (LSCF)-GDC Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) cathodes with various infiltrate loading levels were prepared through multiple nitrate solution infiltrations into porous GDC ionic conducting (IC) scaffolds. Microstructural analyses indicated that the average SSC and average LSCF hemispherical particle radii remained roughly constant, at 25 nm, across multiple infiltration-gelation-firing sequences. Comparisons between symmetric cell polarization resistance measurements and Simple Infiltrated Microstructure Polarization Loss Estimation (SIMPLE) model predictions showed that the SIMPLE model was able to predict the performance of heavily infiltrated SSC-GDC and LSCF-GDC cathodes with accuracies better than 55% and 70%, respectively (without the use of fitting parameters). Poor electronic conduction between mixed ionic electronic conducting (MIEC) infiltrate particles was found in lightly infiltrated cathodes. Since these electronic conduction losses were not accounted for by the SIMPLE model, larger discrepancies between the SIMPLE-model-predicted and measured polarization resistances were observed for lightly infiltrated cathodes. This work demonstrates that the SIMPLE model can be used to quickly determine the lowest possible polarization resistance of a variety of infiltrated MIEC on IC nano-composite cathodes (NCC's) when the NCC microstructure and an experimentally-applicable set of intrinsic MIEC oxygen surface resistances and IC bulk oxygen conductivities are known. Currently, this model is the only one capable of predicting the polarization resistance of heavily infiltrated MIEC on IC NCC's as a function of temperature, cathode thickness, nano-particle size, porosity, and composition.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867947639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867947639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1039/c2cp43370b

    DO - 10.1039/c2cp43370b

    M3 - Article

    VL - 14

    SP - 15379

    EP - 15392

    JO - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

    T2 - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

    JF - Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics

    SN - 1463-9076

    IS - 44

    ER -