What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development?

Jill S. McCourt, Tessa C. Andrews, Jennifer K. Knight, John E. Merrill, Ross H. Nehm, Karen N. Pelletreau, Luanna B. Prevost, Michelle K. Smith, Mark Urban-Lurain, Paula P. Lemons

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    • 2 Citations

    Abstract

    We conducted a study of 19 biology instructors participating in small, local groups at six research-intensive universities connected to the Automated Analysis of Constructed Response (AACR) project (www.msu.edu/∼aacr). Our aim was to uncover participants’ motivation to persist in a long-term teaching professional development effort, a topic that is understudied in discipline-based educational research. We interviewed each participant twice over a 2-year period and conducted qualitative analyses on the data, using expectancy-value theory as a framework for considering motivation. Our analyses revealed that motivation among instructors was high due to their enjoyment of the AACR groups. The high level of motivation is further explained by the fact that AACR groups facilitated instructor involvement with the larger AACR project. We also found that group dynamics encouraged persistence; instructors thought they might never talk with colleagues about teaching in the absence of AACR groups; and groups were perceived to have a low-enough time requirement to warrant sustained involvement. We conclude that instructors have persisted in AACR groups because the groups provided great value with limited cost. The characterization of instructor experiences described here can contribute to a better understanding of faculty needs in teaching professional development.

    LanguageEnglish (US)
    Article numberar54
    JournalCBE Life Sciences Education
    Volume16
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

    Profile

    biology
    instructor
    Teaching
    Group
    Research
    Costs and Cost Analysis
    value theory
    group dynamics
    educational research
    persistence
    Costs
    university
    costs
    Values
    experience

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Education
    • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

    Cite this

    McCourt, J. S., Andrews, T. C., Knight, J. K., Merrill, J. E., Nehm, R. H., Pelletreau, K. N., ... Lemons, P. P. (2017). What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development? CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(3), [ar54]. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241

    What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development? / McCourt, Jill S.; Andrews, Tessa C.; Knight, Jennifer K.; Merrill, John E.; Nehm, Ross H.; Pelletreau, Karen N.; Prevost, Luanna B.; Smith, Michelle K.; Urban-Lurain, Mark; Lemons, Paula P.

    In: CBE Life Sciences Education, Vol. 16, No. 3, ar54, 01.09.2017.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    McCourt, JS, Andrews, TC, Knight, JK, Merrill, JE, Nehm, RH, Pelletreau, KN, Prevost, LB, Smith, MK, Urban-Lurain, M & Lemons, PP 2017, 'What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development?' CBE Life Sciences Education, vol. 16, no. 3, ar54. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241
    McCourt JS, Andrews TC, Knight JK, Merrill JE, Nehm RH, Pelletreau KN et al. What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development? CBE Life Sciences Education. 2017 Sep 1;16(3). ar54. Available from, DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241
    McCourt, Jill S. ; Andrews, Tessa C. ; Knight, Jennifer K. ; Merrill, John E. ; Nehm, Ross H. ; Pelletreau, Karen N. ; Prevost, Luanna B. ; Smith, Michelle K. ; Urban-Lurain, Mark ; Lemons, Paula P./ What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development?. In: CBE Life Sciences Education. 2017 ; Vol. 16, No. 3.
    @article{af69d95f253c48e69262d92195bfc27b,
    title = "What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development?",
    abstract = "We conducted a study of 19 biology instructors participating in small, local groups at six research-intensive universities connected to the Automated Analysis of Constructed Response (AACR) project (www.msu.edu/∼aacr). Our aim was to uncover participants’ motivation to persist in a long-term teaching professional development effort, a topic that is understudied in discipline-based educational research. We interviewed each participant twice over a 2-year period and conducted qualitative analyses on the data, using expectancy-value theory as a framework for considering motivation. Our analyses revealed that motivation among instructors was high due to their enjoyment of the AACR groups. The high level of motivation is further explained by the fact that AACR groups facilitated instructor involvement with the larger AACR project. We also found that group dynamics encouraged persistence; instructors thought they might never talk with colleagues about teaching in the absence of AACR groups; and groups were perceived to have a low-enough time requirement to warrant sustained involvement. We conclude that instructors have persisted in AACR groups because the groups provided great value with limited cost. The characterization of instructor experiences described here can contribute to a better understanding of faculty needs in teaching professional development.",
    author = "McCourt, {Jill S.} and Andrews, {Tessa C.} and Knight, {Jennifer K.} and Merrill, {John E.} and Nehm, {Ross H.} and Pelletreau, {Karen N.} and Prevost, {Luanna B.} and Smith, {Michelle K.} and Mark Urban-Lurain and Lemons, {Paula P.}",
    year = "2017",
    month = "9",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "16",
    journal = "CBE Life Sciences Education",
    issn = "1931-7913",
    publisher = "American Society for Cell Biology",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - What motivates biology instructors to engage and persist in teaching professional development?

    AU - McCourt,Jill S.

    AU - Andrews,Tessa C.

    AU - Knight,Jennifer K.

    AU - Merrill,John E.

    AU - Nehm,Ross H.

    AU - Pelletreau,Karen N.

    AU - Prevost,Luanna B.

    AU - Smith,Michelle K.

    AU - Urban-Lurain,Mark

    AU - Lemons,Paula P.

    PY - 2017/9/1

    Y1 - 2017/9/1

    N2 - We conducted a study of 19 biology instructors participating in small, local groups at six research-intensive universities connected to the Automated Analysis of Constructed Response (AACR) project (www.msu.edu/∼aacr). Our aim was to uncover participants’ motivation to persist in a long-term teaching professional development effort, a topic that is understudied in discipline-based educational research. We interviewed each participant twice over a 2-year period and conducted qualitative analyses on the data, using expectancy-value theory as a framework for considering motivation. Our analyses revealed that motivation among instructors was high due to their enjoyment of the AACR groups. The high level of motivation is further explained by the fact that AACR groups facilitated instructor involvement with the larger AACR project. We also found that group dynamics encouraged persistence; instructors thought they might never talk with colleagues about teaching in the absence of AACR groups; and groups were perceived to have a low-enough time requirement to warrant sustained involvement. We conclude that instructors have persisted in AACR groups because the groups provided great value with limited cost. The characterization of instructor experiences described here can contribute to a better understanding of faculty needs in teaching professional development.

    AB - We conducted a study of 19 biology instructors participating in small, local groups at six research-intensive universities connected to the Automated Analysis of Constructed Response (AACR) project (www.msu.edu/∼aacr). Our aim was to uncover participants’ motivation to persist in a long-term teaching professional development effort, a topic that is understudied in discipline-based educational research. We interviewed each participant twice over a 2-year period and conducted qualitative analyses on the data, using expectancy-value theory as a framework for considering motivation. Our analyses revealed that motivation among instructors was high due to their enjoyment of the AACR groups. The high level of motivation is further explained by the fact that AACR groups facilitated instructor involvement with the larger AACR project. We also found that group dynamics encouraged persistence; instructors thought they might never talk with colleagues about teaching in the absence of AACR groups; and groups were perceived to have a low-enough time requirement to warrant sustained involvement. We conclude that instructors have persisted in AACR groups because the groups provided great value with limited cost. The characterization of instructor experiences described here can contribute to a better understanding of faculty needs in teaching professional development.

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027830949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027830949&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241

    DO - 10.1187/cbe.16-08-0241

    M3 - Article

    VL - 16

    JO - CBE Life Sciences Education

    T2 - CBE Life Sciences Education

    JF - CBE Life Sciences Education

    SN - 1931-7913

    IS - 3

    M1 - ar54

    ER -